Categories: Cricket

Ravindra Jadeja was found to have breached Article 2.20 of the ICC Code of Conduct fined 25 per cent of his match fee

Ravindra Jadeja was found to have breached Article 2.20 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to displaying conduct that is contrary to the spirit of the game.

In addition to this, one demerit point has been added to Jadeja’s disciplinary record. This was his first offence in a 24-month period.
The incident occurred during the 46th over of Australia’s first innings on Thursday, 9 February, when Jadeja was seen applying a soothing cream to his index finger. In the video footage, the left-arm spinner took a substance from Mohammed Siraj’s palm and appeared to rub this onto the index finger of his left hand. 

The India team management had explained that the finger spinner was applying the cream to a swelling on the index finger of his bowling hand. This was done without asking for permission from the on-field umpires.

The incident occurred during the 46th over of Australia’s first innings on Thursday, 9 February, when Jadeja was seen applying a soothing cream to his index finger. In the video footage, the left-arm spinner took a substance from Mohammed Siraj’s palm and appeared to rub this onto the index finger of his left hand. 

The India team management had explained that the finger spinner was applying the cream to a swelling on the index finger of his bowling hand. This was done without asking for permission from the on-field umpires.

Jadeja admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by Andy Pycroft of the Emirates ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees, so there was no need for a formal hearing.

In reaching his decision to sanction the player along with the Level 1 sanction he imposed, the Match Referee was satisfied that the cream was applied to the finger purely for medical purposes. The cream was not applied as an artificial substance to the ball and consequently, it did not change the condition of the ball, which would have been in breach of clause 41.3 of the ICC playing conditions – Unfair Play – The Match Ball – Changing its Condition

On-field umpires Nitin Menon and Richard Illingworth, third umpire Michael Gough and fourth umpire KN Ananthapadmanabhan levelled the charge.

Level 1 breaches carry a minimum penalty of an official reprimand, a maximum penalty of 50 per cent of a player’s match fee, and one or two demerit points.

Sports Desk

Recent Posts

Jasprit Bumrah’s Workload Debate: Balwinder Singh Sandhu Criticizes Modern “Workload Management”

The workload of Indian bowlers has become a hot topic after Jasprit Bumrah sustained an…

4 months ago

Jasprit Bumrah’s Dominance and India’s Struggles in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy

Jasprit Bumrah delivered a sensational performance in the Melbourne Test, earning high praise from Adam…

4 months ago

Sunil Gavaskar Praises Rishabh Pant’s Impactful Innings at SCG

A few days ago, Sunil Gavaskar went viral for his fiery commentary during the ongoing…

4 months ago

Mohammad Kaif Slams Team Management Over Rohit Sharma’s Exclusion

Former India batter Mohammad Kaif expressed his disagreement with the team management and selectors for…

4 months ago

Rohit Sharma Dropped? Gambhir, Bumrah in Intense Discussion Ahead of Sydney Test

India's head coach Gautam Gambhir and vice-captain Jasprit Bumrah were seen having a lengthy discussion…

4 months ago

Tension Rises in Indian Dressing Room as Gambhir Lays Down the Law After MCG

An explosive report has revealed growing tension within the Indian cricket camp, with head coach…

4 months ago